Know exactly what your monitoring stack does, costs, and duplicates.
A vendor-neutral workspace where your committee audits the tools you already pay for, evaluates the ones you are considering, and puts a one-page briefing in front of leadership. We never sell software and never pick a vendor for you.
No credit card. Your data stays in your organization’s own workspace. Already have an account? Log in.
Two ways in
Audit what you have. Evaluate what you are considering.
Both run as a committee, both end in your own weighted vote, and both produce a record you can hand to finance, security, and the board.
Stack Audit
Inventory the monitoring and observability tools you already run. Each one is mapped to a fixed set of thirty capabilities, and the arithmetic does the rest.
- Which capabilities two or more tools cover fully, and what that overlap costs
- Which tools are fully shadowed by others, stated as a fact about coverage, not a verdict
- What nobody monitors, and which renewals are close enough to act on
- Consolidation options described, never ranked, that your committee scores and votes on
Vendor evaluation
A formal, multi-stakeholder evaluation of the vendors you are considering, with the paper trail an enterprise purchase needs.
- Weighted criteria, named candidates, and web-grounded research with citations
- Every stakeholder scores independently; the committee’s own vote decides
- RFI, RFP and RFQ drafts generated from your criteria
- Decision report, presentation with speaker notes, Word and PDF exports
Advisory tools
Ten views built from your own data, made for the people who sign the renewals.
Each one describes, measures, and asks the right questions. None of them tells you which product to buy.
Read a complete sample briefing for a fictional organization →
Executive briefing
One page for leadership: what you run, what it costs, where it overlaps, what nobody monitors, what renews soon. Download as Word or PDF.
Any projectRenewal radar
Every renewal soonest first with your own leverage next to it, reminders at 120, 90, 60 and 30 days, and a negotiation-prep brief.
Stack AuditCost and forecast
Spend per team and per seat, plus a three-year outlook if nothing changes versus each consolidation option.
Stack AuditCoverage gaps by risk
Describe your environment and every uncovered capability is ranked by how much it matters to you, with the reason shown.
Stack AuditMaturity assessment
Eighteen questions, answered by each stakeholder independently. A scored profile, and the places where your team disagrees.
Any projectAlert noise audit
Paste an export from your paging tool. See alerts per week, after-hours load, duplicates, and alerts nobody acted on.
Any projectPostmortem coach
A neutral read of an incident write-up: how it was detected, what contributed, which capabilities were involved, and what the write-up left out.
Any projectContract and quote review
A plain-language breakdown of a vendor document: pricing unit, escalators, notice windows, and the questions to ask before you sign anything.
Any projectQuarterly re-audit
Confirm the inventory each quarter and see exactly what appeared, what left, and how spend and overlap moved.
Stack AuditPeer benchmarks
Anonymized figures across every organization that has completed a Stack Audit here. Distributions only, never a ranking.
PlatformHow it works
From first login to a board-ready briefing in an afternoon.
No integrations to install and no agents to deploy. The committee enters what it knows; the workspace does the arithmetic and keeps the record.
Create a committee
Sign up, name your organization, and invite the stakeholders who should have a say. Owners, admins and members each see the same data.
Enter the inventory
Add each tool with its cost, seats, teams and renewal date. Known products are mapped to capabilities automatically; anything else can be mapped by hand or with a web-grounded pass.
Read the analysis
Overlap, gaps, shadowed tools, spend on overlap, renewal radar, cost forecast and ranked risks appear as soon as the inventory exists.
Decide as a committee
Score the options, vote with weighted ballots, and export the briefing and decision report. Come back each quarter to measure the drift.
Why it can be trusted
Independent by design, not by promise.
ITMonitoring.com is an advisory practice. We do not resell software, no monitoring vendor pays us for placement, and the workspace is built so that it cannot recommend one. Every figure is arithmetic over data your committee entered, every method is stated on the page, and every decision is yours.
- Consolidation options are listed in generated order with no recommended label.
- Reviews of contracts and postmortems describe and ask; they never say sign, renew or cancel.
- Peer benchmarks show distributions only, never a named organization, and unlock only at five or more participants.
- Your organization’s data is never shown to another organization.
Start with the tools you already pay for.
The overlap map fills in as soon as the second tool is entered. The rest of the workspace is ready when you are.